utwclassifiedsbradydistrict
  TULSA METRO’S ONLY INDEPENDENT NEWSWEEKLY
UTW Reader Comments  |  Has Something Made You Mad? Tell Us!    
Home » News » City, State, County, Education
RSS XML

Hiccups Fatal

Real estate developer says city ordinances made it impossible to finance upscale apartments in Brookside


BY BRIAN ERVIN

The much-hyped upscale apartment complex announced to be in the works for Brookside last month is no longer happening.

"We're terminating the contract," said a representative for Houston real estate developer, Bomasada Group last week.

The plan was to build an upscale, $40 million, five-story, 240-unit apartment complex on Brookside near 41st St. and Peoria Ave. on the site currently occupied by the less-swanky Brookside Annex and Brookside Courtyard apartments.

While there were a few naysayers, the plan was received with mostly positive responses by neighborhood residents and business leaders in anticipation of the economic benefits it would bring to the area.

But, days after the announcement, UTW was told that it had been placed on the "backburner" due to "hiccups" from the city government.

Well, those "hiccups" proved to be fatal, the proverbial "backburner" has gone cold, and the deal is off.

John Gilbert, senior vice president of Bomasada, said the construction costs would be too prohibitive due to some peculiarities in the city's requirements.

He said city ordinances would have required them to construct the complex in segments, and to install a commercial fire sprinkler system instead of a residential system.

Gilbert said the Bomasada Group tried to renegotiate the purchase price of the property to offset the higher-than-expected construction costs, but the seller was unwilling to budge.

"In regard to the contract termination, I was asked to reduce the contract price by the amount of their excess construction costs due to city requirements, which . . . were in excess of what is expected within the international building code," said Dan Perry of Perry Properties, who owns the two apartment complexes currently on the lot.

"Apparently, there is a procedure in place to resolve these types of differences, which they were not willing to pursue at this time," he added.

Concerning his unwillingness to renegotiate the price, Perry said, "The price had already been agreed upon, and I did not see any need to sell the property for less than fair market value. Midtown property value is increasing, especially in the Brookside and Cherry Street areas."

Perry said he doesn't currently have any other buyers lined up, and he isn't actively seeking any.

"I have never listed the property for sale, nor do I intend to . . . at this time. Should another opportunity present itself, I will make the best decision I can make at that time," he said.

"You will not find another parcel of land like this in Midtown Tulsa. If I had the money, I would redevelop the property myself. I will do the best I can with the property until presented a better opportunity. The reason I bought the property 10 years ago was . . . its location. Buildings and improvements age and depreciate over time, but well-located land generally only appreciates in value," Perry continued.

Gilbert said the Bomasada Group doesn't currently have any other projects in mind for Tulsa, but said, "We're still snooping around" for a place to develop within the city.



Share this article:
Del.icio.us  digg  facebook  Google Bookmarks  MySpace  Newsvine  reddit  Yahoo My Web 

COMMENTS
2 comments posted for this article
Tootles
 7/21/2009 - 1:58am
   The apartment design that Bomasada CHOSE for the city is not compatible with the neighborhood. It is the biggest scale so the biggest money maker for the developer. Greed does not always work well. If the developer had tried to work with the neighbors and listen to their interests, maybe they'd have the property to build on and everyone would be happy. Congeniality in business practices never hurt anyone. The problem here in Tulsa is that these developers think they've got the city leaders in their hip pockets and that if they whine enough or threaten NOT to build, they can get whatever they want. We need better leadership in INCOG and TAMPC. They should be looking out for the neighbors interests as well as the city's. If a developer wants to build badly enough, they will compromise.
Report this comment
psilver145 (psilver145@yahoo.com), Sand Springs
 3/18/2008 - 11:01am
   This appears to be a case of two greedy business people that doesn't care about the city.. Just what is in their pockets.. By the same token, it is a case of the city not co-operating with certain types of business, while giveing City Hall away to others,,, And then people wonder why more and more are moving out of Tulsa for the suburbs..
Report this comment

Post a comment




MORE BY BRIAN ERVIN
Man on a Mission
Steve Whitaker, martial arts master and warrior for Tulsa's homeless, fights for downtown Tulsa [August 13, 2008]
Second Tour of Duty
If not for the kindness of strangers, Tulsa's police chief might still be stocking groceries in Kansas City [July 30, 2008]
Between Discipline and a Hard Place
Tulsa Academic Center could work, given the proper management, TPS Superintendent tells Urban Tulsa Weekly [July 9, 2008]
My Profile | My Settings
Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2010, Urban Tulsa Weekly   RSS