ABoT Vote Nowurbatulsaclassifiedsbutton
  TULSA METRO'S ONLY INDEPENDENT NEWSWEEKLY
UTW Reader Comments  |  Has Something Made You Mad? Tell Us!    
Home » News » City, State, County, Education
  RSS XML

Speed Kills

Electronic ticketing system may increase city revenue and decrease automobile accidents


BY MIKE EASTERLING

All but lost in the hand-wringing over Mayor Kathy Taylor's recent announcement that the city faced a $3.5-million general fund deficit were figures indicating a steep drop in the number of citations issued for traffic and parking violations, code enforcements and criminal activities.

But those numbers did not escape the attention of District 7 City Councilor John Eagleton.

"I don't know if the English language has words for how disturbing they were," he said of the Municipal Court figures, which indicate that during the first five months of fiscal year 2009, the number of citations issued fell by approximately 40 percent compared to the same time a year earlier. For the period from July through November of fiscal year 2008, 42,409 citations were issued, but that number fell to 24,295 for FY 2009 -- a difference of 18,114 citations. The biggest drop was in July 2009, when only 4,556 citations were issued, compared to 9,363 last year, a reduction by more than 50 percent.

Eagleton declined to comment on the reasons for that decline. A spokesman for Mayor Kathy Taylor -- who said at the Feb. 3 City Council meeting that she was trying to learn from the city departments that issue the citations why the figures had fallen so dramatically -- referred questions last week to Tulsa Police Chief Ron Palmer.

The decrease in citations has meant a corresponding reduction in revenue for the city, which has contributed to the general fund deficit. But to Eagleton, who for two years has been trying to get an electronic ticketing proposal adopted by the council, there are more ominous implications. He took those numbers as yet another example of why Tulsa needs to do something quickly about the number of motorists who speed and commit other moving violations at the expense of other drivers' safety.

"The idea that a person can go through an entire eight-hour patrol shift and not witness a single traffic violation is baffling to me," Eagleton said on Feb. 12, the day his proposal was to go back before the council for a public hearing. To further illustrate his point, he claimed he had almost been T-boned at an intersection that morning by a motorist running a red light.

Eagleton proposes that the city purchase 50 hand-held e-ticket devices, equipment that he said will make ticket writing a much faster and efficient task for Tulsa police officers, resulting in what he believes would be a 20 to 40 percent increase in citations and a corresponding drop in dangerous driving. Each device has a bar-code reader through which a driver's license could be scanned, recording all the motorist's information without the officer having to do it by hand. The information would be filed automatically at Municipal Court, saving city employees the time of recording it and all but eliminating mistakes.

Essentially, Eagleton said, a 20-minute traffic stop would be reduced to five minutes.

The program would cost more than $400,000 and be financed by unallocated funds from previous third-penny and general-obligation bond programs. The proposal could come up for a vote as early as March.

Electronic ticketing has been adopted by various law enforcement agencies across the country, many of whom have reported positive results. Among the cities that have gone to the system are Cleveland, Miami-Dade County, Tucson, Los Angeles and San Jose, as well as the state of Texas.

Eagleton said Tulsa police experimented with a two-week trial in the fall of 2006, during which officers "deliberately and aggressively" enforced the traffic code. He said the program was proof of the benefits of beefed-up enforcement.

In the two months before the program, he said, there were 11 traffic-related fatalities in Tulsa. In the four months afterward, there were only six.

"So in twice as much time, there were almost half as many fatalities," he said. "And there was a corresponding decrease in serious accidents."

Eagleton said Tulsa averages 40 traffic-related fatalities a year, a number he believes could be heavily impacted by better enforcement of the traffic code. Citing a plethora of statistics from communities that already have adopted it, he believes the e-ticket program would pay for itself in short order, not to mention the lives, money and suffering saved by the reduction in accidents.

Eagleton makes no apologies for his crusade against speeders and those who run red lights, citing his own experience as an accident victim and his many friends who have suffered from what he called negligence by other drivers.

"Yeah, I'm a zealot, in case you haven't noticed," he said.

Eagleton has high hopes for his proposal, which he described as a no-brainer, but he said its passage is far from being certain.

"I was surprised last time when it got tabled, so I am reluctant to predict the behavior of my fellow counselors," he said. "But I will continue to moo cow about this."



Share this article:
 
Google Bookmarks  digg  Del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo My Web  Newsvine  MySpace 

COMMENTS
5 comments posted for this article
LightSpeedAway
 2/21/2009 - 11:07pm
   Zealot Eagleton, flawed logic and all, is befuddled by dwindling ticket revenues not covering costly city expenditures. Yet he states, in other words, that 'patrols run entire shifts without citing a single infraction'. It seems loose enforcement is the underlying issue, not officers completely overwhelmed with ticket writing. If the fundamental issue is truely light enforcement, then clearly, throwing costly technology at this problem is not the solution. If the problem is police not writing tickets because they don't have the latest "gadgets & toys", then that's another problem altogether.
   
   Further, a two week trial period of these devices with 'deliberate and aggressive enforcement' provides NO PROOF whatsoever as to the (imaginary) benefits of these devices beside the fact that stepping up enforcement itself is what makes a real difference. It seems quite obvious that near half a million dollars worth of ticket dohickeys (@ ~$8000 a piece!? Are you F'ing kidding me?!?) would be a disastrous waste of money. Bad Zealot, bad!
   
   Additionally, he hasn't even attempted to account for the possibility of lighter traffic, carpools, or more sensible driving due to recent economic circumstances and record high gas prices. And further, just what cash strapped families need right now is additional expense from traffic tickets. Could it be that police have been focusing more recently on real crimes? Case in point, compare the current murder rate to the same time period last year.
   
   Frankly, the only real perceivable danger is motorists running red lights and aggressive highway driving (which is generally accompanied by speeding anyways). Save the speed traps for neighborhoods where there are kids and it's truely dangerous to speed.
   
   As for the t-bone incident, we all have our anecdotal accounts of bad driving. I live in Brady in the 900 block and call it Interstate Denver. The way people fly through here, it's like the Tisdale Parkway. Yet I've only seen one traffic stop near my home in over a year and a half. All across America people generically state, "we have the worst drivers in ___fill_in_blank___".
   
   What the city needs is fair and adequete enforcement with input from the citizens while utilizing reasonably available tools (like the internet and good old pen and paper) . They work just fine and much faster than Zealot's claimed (and overblown) 20 minutes per stop. With my reasonable share of tickets (received the old-fashioned way), it's never taken more than 5-10 minutes with all documents in order. If we need a high tech solution, I recommend a traffic website where citizens can post to the authorities where they regularly see a specific need for concentrated enforcement efforts. Now that makes sense!
Report this comment
Foster57
 2/19/2009 - 6:27pm
   MONEY MONEY MONEY that is all these people know . They spend it on what ever they want. And cry when the need more .Just think people if you take the human error out of driving to the letter of the law . That would mean no money for them . remember no set amount of tickets to write ha ha bs
Report this comment
Bootslacky
 2/19/2009 - 12:44pm
   Tracey - Re-read the article, they are speaking about electronic citation, not Cameras on traffic lights.
   
   Spudnat - They are referring to the Fiscal Year for the city of Tulsa. Fiscal years do not have to follow a calendar year, such as that they might end their Fiscal year in March. Meaning that in April, the 2010 Fiscal Year would be beginning.
Report this comment
Tracey
 2/19/2009 - 10:49am
   I don't think this is a good idea simply because if you don't have a person present the ticket in person there will be many errors. Example: My brother is driving my vehicle. It's raining and the streets are slick. He is approaching a green traffic light at the current speed limit. Suddenly the light turns yellow and quickly to red. He doesn't have time to stop and if he tries to he would slide into the intersection because the streets are slick. My tag is captured on the camera and I get a ticket in the mail and have to pay it or appear in court to protest it. Even though I wasn't the driver.
   If there were a police man present at the time he could have evaluated the situation and would know that it wasn't me in my vehicle. He would not ticket me but the actual driver, if it were necessary. And I would not be having to appear in court for something I didn't do or for something that could not have been prevented.
Report this comment
SPUDNAT
 2/19/2009 - 6:44am
   IDIOTS , WE ARE IN THE SECOND MONTH OF 2009 . HOW CAN YOU QUOTE STATISTICS UP TO MAY 2009. THE ACCIDENT RATE BEFORE AND AFTER YOUR INTRODUCTION OF HAND HELD THINGYS IS BOUN TO BE UP OR DOWN AS THE LAW OF AVERAGES STATES . TRY DOING THEM AGAIN , THAY WILL BE DIFFERENT AGAIN . YOU ARE ALL STUPID. SPEED DOES NOT CAUSE ACCIDENTS, BAD DRIVING IS THE CAUSE,THATS WHY DESPITE MORE N MORE CAMS , THE ACCIDENT RATE CONTINUES TO RISE , YOU ARE ALL BLIND. YOU GO MAD , MORE ACCIDENTS MORE SPEED CAMS, AND NOTHING EVER CHANGES , OPEN YOUR EYES , SEE WHATS IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE , SCRAP THE CAMS ,, STOP THE BAD DRIVERS, THEN AND ONLY THEN , WILL WE GET DOWN TO SAVING LIVES.
Report this comment

Post a comment




The Next Wave
A new Pearl District pond is part of a plan to prevent chronic flooding and add attractions to the area [July 13, 2011]
Still Open-minded
You won't see it anytime soon, but green space still has a green light downtown [July 13, 2011]
Chain of Command-ments
A Broken Arrow politician's Decalogue is done, but its future is in limbo [July 6, 2011]
My Profile | My Settings

Subscriptions Available at $124/yr.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for processing. No refunds are issued. Back issues are available for $10/copy.

We accept Visa, M/C, checks and money orders. Call to charge by phone 918-592-5550. Enter your contact information in the form below and we will contact you.

If ordering by mail, make checks and money orders payable to Urban Tulsa Weekly. Send your payment along with your complete postal delivery address to Urban Tulsa Weekly, Attn: Samantha, PO Box 50499, Tulsa, OK 74150

Name:
Address:
Address2:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:
Phone:
Comments:

 

Urban Tulsa Weekly
1924 E. 6th St.
Tulsa OK 74104
Phone: (918) 592-5550
Fax: (918) 592-5970
e-mail: Subscriptions

Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2013, Urban Tulsa Weekly   RSS