UTW Summer Brewsurbatulsaclassifiedsbutton
  TULSA METRO'S ONLY INDEPENDENT NEWSWEEKLY
UTW Reader Comments  |  Has Something Made You Mad? Tell Us!    
Home » Cinema » Cinema
  RSS XML

An Evening Escort

17 Again uses sex appeal to gracefully sell you fake sincerity


BY JOSH KLINE

Share this article:
 
Google Bookmarks  digg  Del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo My Web  Newsvine  MySpace 

Comments (3)
mail this article Mail Article
print-friendly formatPrint Article
Add to favorites
Scene. Suit no. 1:

Scene. Suit no. 1: "Of course it is. But this chart shows that for every second this Efron kid is shirtless and dancing, our opening numbers will increase by $2 million. We'll be the number one movie of the weekend, easily."

Zac Efron is one charismatic robot.

In a recent Onion article, the pubescent marquee headliner was lampooned as an assembly line production of Disney Channel scientists. His dead eyes, perfect body and status quo conformity place him in the upper echelon of the new Disney breed of money machine superstars. The Jonas Brothers, Miley Cyrus and Efron all have a special place reserved in hell as shameless corporate shills molded to promote a very particular brand of contemporary teenage behavior (the kind that involves mindless consumption), and although Efron is able to flaunt his marginal acting chops for the first time, 17 Again is still a bust.

The film first introduces the Disney golden boy as shirtless on a basketball court, shooting hoops in a transparent effort to echo his High School Musical star persona. Five minutes later, he inexplicably jumps out onto the court to join a cheerleading troupe's dance number. It's the kind of scene that one imagines a board of suits developing late in the writing process.

Suit no. 1: "We need at least one dance number with the kid before the opening credits."

Suit no. 2: "Bob, you're a genius. The little girls will be wetting themselves."

Suit no. 3: "Don't you think that'll come off as a cynical ploy for cash? Why would the kid just start dancing? It's kinda obvious if you ask me."

Suit no. 1: "Of course it is. But this chart shows that for every second this Efron kid is shirtless and dancing, our opening numbers will increase by $2 million. We'll be the number one movie of the weekend, easily."

Suit no. 2: "What's our competition?"

Suit no. 1: "Crank 2 and some Russell Crowe movie about journalism."

Suit no. 2: "You're a genius, Bob. Here's the checkbook, go ahead and write yourself the bonus you think you deserve. Number 3, you're fired."

The story of 17 Again is a classic body-switching fantasy in the vein of Freaky Friday. Mike (Efron) is the star of his ball team and preparing for the inevitable college scholarship on the night of the Big Game. Right before tip-off, his girlfriend Scarlet drops the bomb that she's pregnant, and Mike walks off the court and away from future fame and fortune to help raise the child.

He makes the responsible, morally correct decision and is rewarded by waking up 20 years later as a droopy-faced Matthew Perry. He's now a pharmaceutical rep who's constantly passed over for promotion, Scarlet (Leslie Mann) is divorcing him, his kids hate him and he's living with his Star Wars-obsessed best friend Ned (Thomas Lennon, providing the majority of the film's limited humor).

He's in a 20-year rut caused by nagging "what ifs"- what if he'd played the Big Game, what if he hadn't had children, what if he'd gone to college, etc. Obviously, what he needs is a mystical old janitor to transform him back into Zac Efron so he can learn a vague lesson about letting go of the past.

Sure enough, after an ominous storm, Mike wakes up and is magically 17 again. It's still present day and he must now pretend to be a stranger to those around him. (Why is it that no one, including his ex-wife and his basketball coach, seems to remember what Perry looked like as a teenager? Nevermind.) It's a plot contrivance meant to place Efron in a setting that will maximize his star appeal; instead of playing the unlikely perfect teenager, he's now bestowed with a literal superiority that's capitalized on to the nth degree. The intelligence, maturity and wealth of an adult with the baby face of Efron equals big box office bucks.

The whole thing is incredibly easy to dismiss, but the fact is that 17 Again actually isn't a terrible movie. The concept is trite, but it's executed with endearing sincerity by director Burr Steers. Steers, maker of the overrated but amusing indie dramedy Igby Goes Down, is obviously making his own bid for commercial viability, and the success of 17 Again will no doubt give him the freedom to move on to better, more expensive projects.

The film's main problem is that with the casting of Efron the entire project becomes suspect. The baggage that goes with the Disney Channel robot puts front and center a fact that filmgoers are supposed to forget while watching this kind of easily digestible garbage: this movie exists solely to take money from your wallet. Efron is nothing more than a cash machine, a cookie-cutter Ken doll engineered by the Disney scientists to put asses in seats, and his presence is a constant reminder of the film's true nature. It's okay for a movie to exist as a product to be sold, but good commercial filmmaking should be less transparent. It's the difference between casting a movie star and a porn star-- movie stars use sex appeal to gracefully sell you fake sincerity, porn stars crassly sell you what it is that you really want.

In the end it's all about sex, but most respectable people want to be tricked into believing it's not. Given the choice between a classy evening escort and a roadside hooker, most will choose the evening escort. Zac Efron is a roadside hooker.


Share this article:
 
Google Bookmarks  digg  Del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo My Web  Newsvine  MySpace 

COMMENTS
3 comments posted for this article
Amberla, Midtown
 4/23/2009 - 9:29am
   P.S. I did not see the film. I'm sure I would kinda like it if I did. :) Damn those Disney execs...!
Report this comment
Amberla, Midtown
 4/23/2009 - 9:28am
   Well done Josh, you've outdone yourself again! Cynical or not, I think you nailed it. And KD, maybe, HOPEFULLY, Zac Efron will prove to be another Johnny Depp. Only time will tell.
Report this comment
KD
 4/22/2009 - 12:39pm
   Do you know how cynical you sound? I won't even go into all the problems with your review---not that I think you really watched it---because it would do no good. You just want to bad-mouth a young man because he is popular and did a series of Disney movies which doesn't make him a Disney kid. Johnny Depp also did a series of movies for Disney, does that make his a Disney product? Also, in the movie Scarlett played by Leslie Mann IMMEDIATELY sees that Mark looks exactly like her husband Mike when they were that age.
Report this comment

Post a comment




MORE BY JOSH KLINE
Fame and Fortune
Minus a seemingly failed Disney Channel project, latest batch of flicks will please avid genre fans [September 30, 2009]
Defying Expectations
Right person for the right role crafted by the right director make these flicks shineThe Informant!Lorna's Silence [September 23, 2009]
What Could Have Been
Although lacking, 9, Sorority Row show glimpses of newbie directors' potential [September 16, 2009]
My Profile | My Settings

Subscriptions Available at $124/yr.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for processing. No refunds are issued. Back issues are available for $10/copy.

We accept Visa, M/C, checks and money orders. Call to charge by phone 918-592-5550. Enter your contact information in the form below and we will contact you.

If ordering by mail, make checks and money orders payable to Urban Tulsa Weekly. Send your payment along with your complete postal delivery address to Urban Tulsa Weekly, Attn: Samantha, PO Box 50499, Tulsa, OK 74150

Name:
Address:
Address2:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:
Phone:
Comments:

 

Urban Tulsa Weekly
1924 E. 6th St.
Tulsa OK 74104
Phone: (918) 592-5550
Fax: (918) 592-5970
e-mail: Subscriptions

Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2013, Urban Tulsa Weekly   RSS