UTW Summer Brewsurbatulsaclassifiedsbutton
  TULSA METRO'S ONLY INDEPENDENT NEWSWEEKLY
UTW Reader Comments  |  Has Something Made You Mad? Tell Us!    
Home » Columns » OpEd
  RSS XML

"Sanctuary City"

Writer has questions for city council candidate Maria Barnes


BY RIDGE KAYSER

Late last week while mowing my front yard at my home in the Florence Park neighborhood, I was approached by two women going door to door in support of District 4 City Council candidate Maria Barnes. I was first amazed that Barnes' supporters were already canvassing neighborhoods so early in the campaign cycle, and double surprised that they would approach the very person who had mailed out 250 letters to his fellow Florence Park neighbors, advising them of a particular vote Maria Barnes made, during her former term as City Councilor.

Most readers will remember that Maria Barnes lost a re-election battle to current District 4 City Councilor Eric Gomez. It's rare for an incumbent City Councilor to lose a re-election vote, yet Maria Barnes was shunned by her constituent voters, and their votes effectively removed her from office.

Although I don't deserve it, I have been given credit by many, many of my fellow Florence Park neighbors for Maria Barnes defeat. Just prior to her re-election attempt, I wrote a letter addressed to 250 of my fellow neighbors, informing them of Maria Barnes infamous council vote during 2007, where she attempted to keep Tulsa as a "sanctuary city" for those who disrespected the laws of the United States of America, and illegally crossed our border. After the 250 copies of my letter were mailed, former Councilor Maria Barnes lost her re-election vote by fewer than 175 votes, to current City Councilor Eric Gomez.

That infamous vote I informed fellow neighbors of, (those who lacked the time to either attend, or watch the televised City Council Meetings) was the one where then City Councilor Maria Barnes, voted that the City of Tulsa should not adopt a Tulsa policy that follows Oklahoma State House bill 1084 (named the Oklahoma Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act of 2007). This policy that former Councilor Barnes didn't like was a policy that directed the Tulsa Police Department to conduct immigration status checks, only while they were in the act of taking someone into custody on a felony charge.

Tulsa had slowly slipped into "sanctuary city" status, similar to liberal American cities like San Francisco. Many Tulsans' weren't aware that Tulsa had become a sanctuary city of illegal immigrants, but we had. Tulsa Police officers couldn't inquire as to whether the criminals they were arresting were in fact illegal aliens, who should be reported to ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Maria Barnes was very comfortable with a sanctuary city status, and voted to keep us as a sanctuary city, with that infamous vote.

I watched that particular Tulsa City Council meeting that fateful evening in 2007 in horror, with disbelief that a rational adult who possibly believe that sanctuary city status is in Tulsa, and its citizen's best interest. That very evening, after that disappointing vote, and watching former Councilor Barnes vote without even having the courtesy to explain her vote, I made up my mind that I would educate as many of my fellow neighbors in District 4 as possible, as to what the hidden agenda of Councilor Barnes was all about. Not only was her vote shocking, her lack of explaining the vote displayed a level of cowardice in my opinion.

In the weeks after I mailed those 250 letters to fellow neighbors, I received a response that truly warmed my heart. I received dozens, and dozens of thank yous from neighbors that I would encounter on walks thru the neighborhood with my dogs, and occasional encounters in midtown restaurants and coffee shops. The common response was an expression of deep gratitude by fellow neighbors who do not follow the City Council business as closely as I do. The only negative response I got was from one single neighbor, who informed me that she felt Tulsa's government involves itself into too many people's personal business. One negative response and maybe 50 to 60 expressions of thanks.

Ironically, a few weeks after I sent those copies of my letter, I attended a candidate forum between Maria Barnes and Eric Gomez. Councilor Gomez was asked what he thought of Tulsa Police following House Bill 1084 (which Democratic Governor Brad Henry had signed into law on May 9, 2007), and Gomez proudly supported the majority view that illegal aliens arrested on felony complaints should have their immigration status check by the arresting officers, and reported to ICE.

What was Maria Barnes response to the same question? Barnes stated that she felt Oklahoma House Bill 1084 was "mean spirited," and would not support Tulsa following it.

She further stated that she felt that those who have illegally crossed our borders should (and this is a direct, exact, quote I noted during the candidate forum) "get legal." Sorry, but I can't explain what Barnes meant by "get legal," for those who had no respect for the laws and borders of the United States of America.

One final point: back in 2007, many, many constituents of former Councilor Maria Barnes were not aware of her liberal, left-wing support of "sanctuary city" status for our hometown of Tulsa. Barnes kept those views under wraps, only exposed during Council votes that only had a few dozen citizens watching the proceedings, and interested in a public safety issue as important as to whether or not Tulsa would "look the other way" while illegal aliens would drive cars on Tulsa streets, without proper Oklahoma driver's licenses, and compulsory auto liability insurance coverage.

Now, candidate Maria Barnes is proudly displaying on her campaign literature that she does in fact call herself a "progressive". For anyone who is not familiar with the term "progressive," it typically refers to a person who believes the country needs to change to liberal views, and many progressives support an agenda of socialism as opposed to the capitalism that has helped hard working Americans prosper for more than 225 years in the U.S. That's all I'll say about it, as candidate Barnes needs to explain her own claim as to being a "progressive," the same as she needs to explain how illegal aliens who disrespected the laws of America need to "get legal."

Before you go into that voting booth, thoroughly check out the political views of the candidate you are supporting. If you favor "progressive" political views, candidate Maria Barnes has kindly informed us that is what she is. If you don't favor "progressivism", socialism, or other left-wing political views, you ought to consider backing current District 4 City Councilor Eric Gomez.

As in the letter I mentioned sending to fellow neighbors, I'm not telling anyone who to vote for, or which political party to support. My only desire is to inform voters as to exactly what they're voting for. Hopefully, former Councilor Barnes will explain her 2007 vote in detail to Urban Tulsa Weekly's informed voter readers very soon.


Share this article:
 
Google Bookmarks  digg  Del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo My Web  Newsvine  MySpace 

COMMENTS
2 comments posted for this article
Tulsa_Taxpayer
 8/12/2009 - 4:19pm
   I'm missing the point here about TCB's comment. TCB seeming has studied, or has access to a copy of the City Charter (must be either a current or retired city employee, or an ex-city councilor), but what does it have to do with the guest editorial "Sanctuary City"?
   I know the author of that editorial opinion piece very well, and he is a RETIRED CHIEF OFFICER, who served the citizens of Tulsa for about thirty years. He retired due to a critical fireground injury, while serving the citizens of the city he loves. He no longer has to worry about restrictions of his constitutional right to free speech, and speaks out about inept politicians of both political parties. I am very pleased that this information about Barnes was shared with the readers of UTW, many of which reside in City Council District 4. It was very eye opening. I only wish more good samaritans with "insider" information would speak out about those who do not represent the interests of the majority of law-abiding Tulsa taxpayers, who are AMERICAN CITIZENS.
Report this comment
TCB
 8/ 5/2009 - 8:24am
   More to the point here, what about the City Charter, which says: "POLITICAL ACTIVITIES PROHIBITED. No chief, officer, or sworn member of the Fire Department shall take an active part in any campaign for the election of officers of the city, except to vote and privately state a personal opinion."
Report this comment

Post a comment




MORE BY RIDGE KAYSER
Think Before You Vote
Reconsider the past and its issues before going to the voting booth for District 4 [November 4, 2009]
No Comment
Change for North Tulsa starts with change in leadership [April 22, 2009]
My Profile | My Settings

Subscriptions Available at $124/yr.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for processing. No refunds are issued. Back issues are available for $10/copy.

We accept Visa, M/C, checks and money orders. Call to charge by phone 918-592-5550. Enter your contact information in the form below and we will contact you.

If ordering by mail, make checks and money orders payable to Urban Tulsa Weekly. Send your payment along with your complete postal delivery address to Urban Tulsa Weekly, Attn: Samantha, PO Box 50499, Tulsa, OK 74150

Name:
Address:
Address2:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:
Phone:
Comments:

 

Urban Tulsa Weekly
1924 E. 6th St.
Tulsa OK 74104
Phone: (918) 592-5550
Fax: (918) 592-5970
e-mail: Subscriptions

Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2013, Urban Tulsa Weekly   RSS