ABoT Vote Nowurbatulsaclassifiedsbutton
  TULSA METRO'S ONLY INDEPENDENT NEWSWEEKLY
UTW Reader Comments  |  Has Something Made You Mad? Tell Us!    
Home » News » City, State, County, Education
  RSS XML

True to Blue?

Despite officer indictments, officials press for continued trust of police department


BY MIKE EASTERLING

Share this article:
 
Google Bookmarks  digg  Del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo My Web  Newsvine  MySpace 

Comments (7)
mail this article Mail Article
print-friendly formatPrint Article
Add to favorites
Out with the Bad Grapes. After the indictment of four
current and one former officers of the Police Department,
Police Chief Chuck Jordan and Phil Evans, president of
the FOP, have emphasized that it’s an isolated incident
that doesn’t reflect the entire department.

Out with the Bad Grapes. After the indictment of four current and one former officers of the Police Department, Police Chief Chuck Jordan and Phil Evans, president of the FOP, have emphasized that it’s an isolated incident that doesn’t reflect the entire department.

The head of Tulsa's local police lodge applauded a series of changes initiated by interim Police Chief Chuck Jordan in the wake of the indictment and arrest of four current and one former Tulsa Police Department officers last week, but he said he hopes the public will keep an open mind about the guilt of the accused men.

Phil Evans, president of the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 93, said he was pleased at the steps Jordan had taken to crack down on officers guilty of lying in reports or in other legal documents. The chief said such officers could be subject to presumptive disciplinary action of termination, consistent with just cause principles.

Evans said he regarded that new policy largely as a return to the way things used to be at the department.

"When I came on board, if you lied, they fired you," he said, though he claimed that a variety of court decisions and liberal judges had led the department to back away from that policy throughout the years, leading to suspensions instead of firings for those guilty of lying.

"We need to be truthful," Evans said. "People need to know we're honest if we're the ones carrying out the law. This is a huge move in getting us back there. People trust us to be honest and do the right thing."

At the same time, Evans said he wished to remind citizens that the five officers or former officers who were indicted or arrested have not been convicted of anything.

"First off, we need to remember the accused are innocent until proven guilty," he said. "I know all these guys, and I find it impossible to believe they would do any of the things they're accused of. Hopefully, when they get their day in court, they'll be vindicated."

The charges against officers Bill Yelton, Nick DeBruin, Bruce Bonham and Jeff Henderson, and former officer Harold Wells stem from a long-term investigation conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI. The charges against the men, which total dozens of counts in some cases, range from distributing drugs and conspiracy to steal money to perjury and witness tampering.

The four officers have been suspended without pay.

District 2 City Councilor Rick Westcott, a former Tulsa police officer, echoed Evans' reminder to citizens that the accused men have not been convicted of anything and are entitled to a fair trial.

"With that in mind, I am surprised, knowing a couple of the officers," he said. "In fact, I went through the academy with Harold Wells (in the fall of 1975), and while we have not been close the last couple of years, I am very surprised. I never would have guessed he would have been involved in anything like it appears that he is."

The department issued a statement in the wake of the unsealing of the indictments against the men, claiming the actions they are accused of is not indicative of those who make up the department or the profession in general.

"This behavior is an anomaly and an isolated incident; nonetheless, the actions of a few have cast doubt on the hard-working honest men and women of the Tulsa Police Department," the statement reads. "The rank and file is outraged by this type of behavior and will not stand or tolerate it in any form."

Mayor Dewey Barlett Jr. joined Jordan and Evans at a press conference last week announcing the department's new policy regarding officers found guilty of lying. He said he was pleased the three of them were in agreement on the need for the change.

"The city of Tulsa and its citizens have invested large amounts of money in training officers and also a lot of trust," he said. "We trust them to take care of us, and 99 percent of them do. But allegedly, some of them have not and have allegedly been corrupted. That's very discouraging when we hear something like that, and we have to act quickly and very aggressively to punish the offenders."

Evans said the news of the indictments was jarring, even though officers had been hearing rumors that something was afoot.

"We're pretty sad," he said. "We're devastated to think something like this could happen. This is as shocking to everyone else as it is to me; although I hope they did not do it."

Evans said he would do everything he could to reinforce the notion that Tulsa police officers are trustworthy, and he said his fellow officers recognize the importance of avoiding even the impression of impropriety. If the indictments have caused the public to take a negative view of officers, he said, he hasn't been hearing it from citizens.

"No, I have not, and I've been ready for it," he said. "I've been expecting it."

Bartlett was more worried about what the impact the scandal has had on public perceptions of the department.

"It certainly didn't help it any," he said.

Westcott said he believes the department's leadership will play a huge role in keeping that from happening.

"I believe we have the right man in the chief's office," he said. "I've known Chief Jordan for 30 years or more, and I believe Chuck is the right person to address these issues. I hope the public will see these as a small number of officers in the grand scheme of things and see that the majority of officers are dedicated public servants."


Share this article:
 
Google Bookmarks  digg  Del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo My Web  Newsvine  MySpace 

COMMENTS
7 comments posted for this article
TruthinTulsa
 8/ 1/2010 - 8:32am
   There are two types of orders, one is a restraining order, the other is a protective order. Restraining orders are civil orders and CANNOT be enforced by the Police. Protective orders are the only type of those two orders that can be enforced by means of arrest. This is a common misconception by the public. The public is not aware usually and they fail to do their homework before seeking court orders against domestic partners, etc etc.. Might want to ask your attorney why he/she didn't file for a protective order instead? Now, lets see if your as quick to apologize for hammering the Police for something they know about and you obviously do not.
Report this comment
gail
 7/30/2010 - 3:02pm
   Sharkey, apparently you haven't gotten a restraining/ protective order for a while. His (my ex's) restraining/protective order specifically states the distance she must stay away and "they, the police" do not enforce the specific issues listed on the order. Of course, after being called and by the time the police arrive several hours later, if at all, she is gone. I hope you never have the cause or reason to need such an order. Even after your most informative reply, I still have no faith in our police department.
   
   Gail
Report this comment
BlackPower, Glenpool
 7/29/2010 - 4:00pm
   Theres still some dirty cops out there and some snitches also the streets r hot
Report this comment
rustydog
 7/29/2010 - 3:02pm
   so it is the liberals fault cops are crooked ,i think the FOP filed the lawsuits making it harder to fire these thugs.MR EVANS i guess if you are head of the FOP you can still lie huh
Report this comment
mad cajun
 7/29/2010 - 11:36am
   This is a bunch of crap. Do they seriously need to make a policy that says no lying, seriously this sad. From personal experience: The # 1 rule of the TULSA POLICE ACADEMY is NO LYING. If you are caught lying you will be fired. When i went through the academy I was forced to quit my dream job with two weeks to go, because of one of TULSA's finest lied, saying I said something that I didt say. Even when there were witnesses saying I didnt. To tell us now that there is a new Policy agianst that is bascically telling Tulsan oop we got caught. These guys need to be hammered by the law and do time because how many people are serving longer sentences because they lied.
Report this comment
Sharkey
 7/29/2010 - 12:08am
   If you live in Oklahoma, Im sorry that the bad eggs have affected your faith in the police. As far as you ex's restraining order,Oklahoma has protective orders and they do not have distance requirements. They have specific rules that apply and sitting down the street in her vehicle is not a violation. Entering his residence is one of the violations if the Judge orders it. The police can only enforce the specific issues listed on the order. If they cannot prove beyond a resonable doubt their hands are tied. As far as the bad eggs, you wont meet a police officer that is not angry at their actions. The job is hard enough without this type of black eye.
Report this comment

Post a comment




The Next Wave
A new Pearl District pond is part of a plan to prevent chronic flooding and add attractions to the area [July 13, 2011]
Still Open-minded
You won't see it anytime soon, but green space still has a green light downtown [July 13, 2011]
Chain of Command-ments
A Broken Arrow politician's Decalogue is done, but its future is in limbo [July 6, 2011]
My Profile | My Settings

Subscriptions Available at $124/yr.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for processing. No refunds are issued. Back issues are available for $10/copy.

We accept Visa, M/C, checks and money orders. Call to charge by phone 918-592-5550. Enter your contact information in the form below and we will contact you.

If ordering by mail, make checks and money orders payable to Urban Tulsa Weekly. Send your payment along with your complete postal delivery address to Urban Tulsa Weekly, Attn: Samantha, PO Box 50499, Tulsa, OK 74150

Name:
Address:
Address2:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:
Phone:
Comments:

 

Urban Tulsa Weekly
1924 E. 6th St.
Tulsa OK 74104
Phone: (918) 592-5550
Fax: (918) 592-5970
e-mail: Subscriptions

Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2013, Urban Tulsa Weekly   RSS