UTW Summer Brewsurbatulsaclassifiedsbutton
  TULSA METRO'S ONLY INDEPENDENT NEWSWEEKLY
UTW Reader Comments  |  Has Something Made You Mad? Tell Us!    
Home » Columns » OpEd
  RSS XML

George W. Bush's Pro-Life Path

Personal experience strengthens former president's beliefs


BY DR. PAUL KENGOR

George W. Bush is an interesting man with a complicated presidency that most Americans -- going into Bush's final year of office -- deemed a failure. At one point, Bush had the worst approval/disapproval rating since Gallup began measuring. His record on domestic policy and foreign policy, on the economy and Iraq, on Katrina and the War on Terror, engenders much heated debate.

That said, George W. Bush was our best pro-life president, hands down. To cite just a few examples:

Bush's confirmed picks to the Supreme Court, from a pro-life standpoint, were superb. His actual policy changes, from bans on partial birth-abortion to stopping taxpayer funding of the deliberate destruction of human embryos, were wonderful. His first day in office, Bush authorized a ban on U.S. taxpayer funding of international "abortion rights" groups like International Planned Parenthood, which seek abortion implementation worldwide. In contrast, President Barack Obama immediately restored that funding his first week in office, specifically, Jan. 23, 2009, the day after the annual March for Life. In August 2002, Bush signed the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, which requires medical attention to a child that accidentally survives an abortion. Barack Obama, as a state senator in Illinois, repeatedly blocked or voted against such legislation.

This is a short list of Bush's pro-life actions.

Yet, unappreciated is the full story behind George W. Bush's pro-life convictions. At its crux is a basic belief that every human life, from the moment of conception, is unique, precious, blessed by God, and deserving of protection by a compassionate society.

But is there more to it, maybe something personal? With the release of Bush's new book, Decision Points, we learn that, yes, there was something deeply personal. As someone who wrote a biography of Bush, I had known only half the story.

It was the mid-1960s. With his father out of town on business, a teenage George W. Bush, the oldest child in the family, and the first with a driver's license, quickly drove his mother to the hospital. She had just had a miscarriage. When Barbara Bush worried she would not be able to walk out of the car, George told her he would carry her into the emergency room. She spent the night in the hospital.

George W. Bush has told that much before. In his new book, however, he continues the conversation, albeit very briefly. He adds that one thing he didn't expect to see during this ordeal was the remains of the fetus.

Bush writes: "I remember thinking: There was a human life, a little brother or sister."

A decade earlier, Bush had lost a little sister, Robin, who he adored, to childhood cancer. It was deeply painful; the Bushes still haven't gotten over it. Here was another loss of a sibling, at an even earlier stage of development.

When asked about this incident in an interview with NBC's Matt Lauer, and explicitly if it spawned his pro-life commitment, Bush merely said he related the story as an example of the bond he has with his mother.

No doubt, though, it was a poignant encounter. Think about the significance: This was pre-Roe v. Wade. It was also long before the blessed advent of ultrasound machines, which have been the single greatest technological factor in convincing women considering abortions to proceed with their pregnancy. The percentage of women persuaded by ultrasound images is upwards of 75-90 percent (studies vary). That's no surprise. These images offer a window into the womb, confirmation that the fetus is not a mere "blob of tissue." It's likewise no surprise that groups like Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Rights Action League are ferocious in opposing legislation requiring or funding ultrasounds. Clearly, this suggests that their goal is not to inform a woman's "choice," as they claim, but to advance abortion. If abortions, overnight, were cut by 75-90 percent, Planned Parenthood would be out of business.

To bring this back to the person of George W. Bush, what he glimpsed after his mother's miscarriage was a vivid, early substitute to an ultrasound image. It portrayed the other end of life. He saw not a brother or sister sucking a thumb or grasping a toe in the womb but someone who never made it. Either way, he saw a human life. He saw a brother or sister -- another potential Robin. Clearly, he or she was not a blob of tissue.

For countless other Americans who experienced such a trial, that's a searing image that affected them in untold ways. For George W. Bush, however, it no doubt set him on a road to becoming America's best pro-life president.

Dr. Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College and executive director of The Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College. His books include "God and George W. Bush" and the newly released "Dupes: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century."


Share this article:
 
Google Bookmarks  digg  Del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo My Web  Newsvine  MySpace 

COMMENTS
1 comment posted for this article
timthorp
 12/17/2010 - 12:11pm
   It's that ever so curious double standard that conservatives (males in particular) love to protect the yet to be born life (a fetus that can't live on its own until it's born), but seem to care much less about the lives of existing people or mothers who have to deal with the children they bear. If life is that precious then there should at least be a discussion about the death penalty and alternative ways to punish a murderer. Not a word about triggering the deaths of over 4,000 American soldiers and thousands of definitely innocent women and children in Iraq (let's just agree that our war in Afghanistan was justified somehow).
   
   It's touching to hear George W Bush mourn the loss of a little brother, but forgetting the sanctity of life when it comes to the big numbers of deaths his decisions caused.
   Progressives make decisions, just like conservatives, based on their value systems. I think it very unAmerican that only conservatives' values should have merit. And maybe America's enemies (Al Qaeda, Taliban and Osama Bin Laden) have been whooping with laughter at how easily the USA created new recruits for their terrorist causes through war and torture.
   Maybe that is the real damage done to America, that conservative administrations played right into the hands of terrorists who want to harm the US.
Report this comment

Post a comment




Liberty, Not License
Celebrate the Fourth of July by confirming thy soul in self-control [June 29, 2011]
Jimmy Carter's Kennedy Problem
Health care, Soviets, Cold War problems all attributed to Carter by former senator [October 13, 2010]
35 Years Ago: When Ford Snubbed Solzhenitsyn
Snub set precedence for conservative swing [September 15, 2010]
My Profile | My Settings

Subscriptions Available at $124/yr.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for processing. No refunds are issued. Back issues are available for $10/copy.

We accept Visa, M/C, checks and money orders. Call to charge by phone 918-592-5550. Enter your contact information in the form below and we will contact you.

If ordering by mail, make checks and money orders payable to Urban Tulsa Weekly. Send your payment along with your complete postal delivery address to Urban Tulsa Weekly, Attn: Samantha, PO Box 50499, Tulsa, OK 74150

Name:
Address:
Address2:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:
Phone:
Comments:

 

Urban Tulsa Weekly
1924 E. 6th St.
Tulsa OK 74104
Phone: (918) 592-5550
Fax: (918) 592-5970
e-mail: Subscriptions

Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2013, Urban Tulsa Weekly   RSS