ABoT Vote Nowurbatulsaclassifiedsbutton
  TULSA METRO'S ONLY INDEPENDENT NEWSWEEKLY
UTW Reader Comments  |  Has Something Made You Mad? Tell Us!    
Home » News » City, State, County, Education
  RSS XML


Views on Vision2

Notable Tulsans from UTW's Hot 100 list mostly back Vision2 proposal


BY JAIME ADAME

Members of Urban Tulsa Weekly's Hot 100 list represent what's noteworthy about the region. Several who made the list in January offered up their opinion on the Vision2 proposal, which would extend a sales tax hike through 2029 to fund economic development (that's Proposition 1) and community projects (Proposition 2).

All Tulsa County voters can have their say at the Nov. 6 election, but here are comments gathered from one group noteworthy for its diversity, among other things:

Michelle Allen, senior marketing and media relations manager for Tulsa's city government: As a city spokesperson I cannot comment on how I will vote, but can say I will be voting and urge others to vote on November 6. Only we can decide how our city moves forward!

Ken Busby, executive director and chief executive officer for the Arts & Humanities Council of Tulsa: Yes, I will be voting FOR Vision2. It's important to build on the great work of Vision 2025 ... It's critically important that we invest in our aerospace infrastructure and maintain facilities for current needs and future growth since it's such a major industry for us! ... With Vision2, we're finally going to have consistent water in the Arkansas River, which is truly one of our region's best assets. Vision2 doesn't add any tax burden, it only extends our current tax.

Dan Cameron, proprietor of Okie Alchemy craft juice and teas: I am still undecided how I will vote for V2. In truth, I support many of the facets that appear to be covered with the measure, especially work along the river ... Former councilors and current councilors have registered concerns about how quickly the measure has been moved and that is a red flag for me ... One thing I would like to add is that I do not see how the fact that our river is considered a "No Contact River" is being addressed. I am all for fixing the dams and holding water. However, if the water is just going to make us ill, I do not see the point. (Note: According to River Parks Authority, "primary body contact" activities like swimming are prohibited in Zink Lake, the pool near Zink Dam at East 29th Street)



Todd Cunningham, executive director for Tulsa Project Theatre: I am voting for the Vision2 proposal. Hell, I'd vote for Vision6, 7, & 8 if they were proposed. Tulsa is an amazing community and for decades was at the forefront of cosmopolitan living in a less-than-giant city. Following the energy bust and the great corporate exodus to the cesspool they call Houston, Tulsa seemed to freeze in time in so many ways. We have some catching up to do in order to reestablish ourselves as that shining city on a hill (that's a Reagan reference but I'll be voting for Obama while also voting for Vision2).

Kara Fleege, Mrs. Broken Arrow 2011 and community volunteer: I am planning on voting yes for the Vision2 proposal. I believe that you should invest in the things you love, and my family loves Tulsa! When I look at the proposal I see jobs and Tulsa needs that. So many people move to other cities to get more. Why not invest in the beautiful city we have and improve it?

Russ Florence, president and chief operating officer, Schnake Turnbo Frank: I'm strongly in favor of Vision2. In my view, it's critical for a city to invest in itself, in order to put it in the best possible position for growth and progress. (Note: The public relations firm is doing work on behalf of Vision2 proponents.)

Jeremy Geiger, actor: I definitely plan on voting for the Vision2 proposal. Our little Tulsa needs all the help it can get and if we don't have to increase anything and we can just keep doing what we're doing with the tax rate I think that is a great way to build some capital so we can make some improvements in our town.

Tara Hughes, owner of In The Raw, Resurrect Boutique and Line Of Shine: This city needs to keep growing! The construction of course has been frustrating, but everything they have done has made this city so much more beautiful! Our city is in such need to grow! We have been owners in various companies and have seen the ups and downs. We must keep heading in the right direction ... Taxes are hard on everyone, but this is our city! I want to continue living here, raising my kids. For us living in mid-town, we will continue to lose people to the suburbs if this doesn't pass. I want to stay right here!

Jamie Jamieson, developer, chair of the Transportation Advisory Board and member of the Pearl District Association: Visionless2 is trying to apply strategies that failed in the 20th century, so it beats me why anyone thinks they will work in the 21st. Advocates of Visionless2 should read (i) anything written by Richard Florida, who more than anyone has influenced the development strategies of US cities this century, and (ii) Tulsa's Comprehensive Plan, which is excellent, and which seems to have been largely ignored by the City's administration, the County and the Chamber.

Rev. Marlin Lavanhar, senior minister at All Souls Unitarian Church: I plan to vote yes because I see Tulsa experiencing a renaissance and Vision 2 has many plans and projects to keep that positive progress going.

Brian Paschal, executive director of Tulsa's Young Professionals: I do plan on voting for Vision2. I feel in large part that I am a product of Vision 2025, and what I mean by that is, I grew up in Tulsa. I left when I was 18 years old and spent 14 years in Los Angeles. ... I didn't know what Vision 2025 was but I did notice that the City of Tulsa in the last few years after 2008 had started to get its swagger back. ... A lot of things ... in terms of development that had taken place in my absence were in large part due to Vision 2025. It's for that reason that I'd like to keep the momentum going.

Isaac Rocha, member of various community boards, employed by The Bama Companies, Inc.: I'm definitely voting yes.

Gary Shaffer, chief executive officer of the Tulsa City-County Library: Gary Shaffer plans to Vote Yes on both Vision2 proposals. (Note: The library would receive $10 million in Vision2 funds.)

John Silva, chief executive officer, Morton Comprehensive Health Services: In building and maintaining a strong community structure, a collaborative relationship needs to exist between business, government and residents. Periodically, opportunities will present themselves that obviously benefit all parties. Vision2 is such an opportunity. ... I have become convinced that both propositions proactively address the present and future priorities of Tulsa County. Vision2 is good for business, good for government and good for the residents of Tulsa County. (Note: Morton would receive $400,000 in Vision2 funds for an industrial generator to be utilized in case of a power outage.)

Send all comments and feedback regarding City to jadame@urbantulsa.com



Share this article:
 
Google Bookmarks  digg  Del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo My Web  Newsvine  MySpace 

COMMENTS
12 comments posted for this article
Rick566, Owasso
 10/14/2012 - 9:57pm
   Golden Ace, where is the proof that Vision 2025 worked. I've seen nothing. A strip mall on the river with almost no businesses in it. A strip mall that is being bought by someone so soon after it was built because it lost money almost from day one. No one wants to sit outside and eat while they stare at nearly dry river bed. What other improvements are you talking about. The worst streets I've ever seen, you mentioned the BOK...big deal. Who profits from the BOK besides the City and a few (very few) small businesses downtown? I would really like for you to point out some improvements that benefit everyone not just a few. Please don't talk about those worthless statues along the river and I hope to God you don't talk about dog parks. Please I really want to know what was done with this money that Bill LaFortune had to have so bad that truly provided some kind of benefit to "everyone".
Report this comment
Rick566, Owasso
 10/14/2012 - 9:48pm
   Anyone who votes for this has not done their homework. We were promised we would not shoulder the financial burden for these "aerospace improvements" and now here we are going to foot the bill to keep a company in Tulsa that files bankruptcy every time we blink. Keeping American Airlines afloat is the responsibility of American Airlines. Let them build their own hangars. Todd Cunningham says that Tulsa was a model of cosmopolitan living. Todd are you high. When did this happen. Tulsa was "NEVER" a model of cosmopolitan living! These people on here that are voting for this proposal if you'll notice are in one way or another connected to the proposal itself. Their organizations are either involved in this proposal or will benefit from it's passing or both. Golden-Ace, we may own the hangars but who uses them and there is more to it than just those particular hangars. AA stands to benefit enormously from the passage of this proposal. You say we lose 11,000 jobs. That is I agree a bad thing. However, businesses come and go and American Airlines should have been allowed to go under completely years ago. The people that manage AA are among the worst in the country. When Crane was involved (and I know this first hand) his theory was expand now, we can always cut back. Well, you see where that theory has gotten AA. Let them fall, let them go elsewhere, Tulsa survived without them before and Tulsa can do it again.
Report this comment
marleymom
 10/14/2012 - 12:02pm
   Please vote for Vision 2 - there are very important projects on the County list - such as the juvenile bureau and court house. That is not a luxury item; it is a necessity and can only be funded by public money. Please don't let the other arguments stand in the way to defeat this very important project.
Report this comment
TCRyan
 10/12/2012 - 7:08am
   @Golden_Ace21 We do own the property but if we were good landlords we would be charging the private corporations who occupy the buildings adequate rent that reflects the market value. Besides the fact that these private companies pay little (as low as $1 Dollar a year!!) to NO rent for the space, the lease they signed clearly states that the tenant, not Tulsa County taxpayers, are responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the buildings. Furthermore, something like $135 MILLION would go towards equipment and training for American Airlines.
   Now we have Don Walker, vice-chair for the pro-Vision2 folks, saying things like - "Were it not for the potential of job loss, I would never recommend that we borrow this money to renovate and repair the facilities, but we have to do it now," Sure sounds like a bailout to me. Even using the same type of emotional blackmail used to pass the bailouts on the federal level. Vision2 is too rushed. We don't know enough about these proposals to allow them to pass. Vote NO. www.Facebook.com/StopVision2
Report this comment
TulsaGolfer
 10/11/2012 - 5:57pm
   Let's talk about 3/4 of a billion dollars! We are funding the suburbs, so this will not stop the flight to the suburbs. When the suburbs have to finance themselves, then there will be a balance. Let Vision 2025 run its course so we can have a real discourse around these issues.
Report this comment
ti
 10/10/2012 - 6:01pm
   Mayb bailout was the wrong word. As I recall in the vision 2025 vote, AA was threating to pull out of Tulsa if vision 2025 wasnt passed. I can tell you AA had no intention of pulling out of Tulsa, its called blackmailing the taxpayer, the bus plant is doing it this year and has no plans to leave just layoff which has already started. Money that was recieved at AA from vision 2025 wasnt used properly, AA still had layoffs and outsourced work, and is doing it even more in the BK. Which is my next question why are we even considering giving money to a company that has no leadership what so ever, they have to pay 20 million a month for consultants and attorneys to tell them what to do, people that have no idea what it takes to run an airline, come on people AA is gonna sell the base in pieces anyway to the best bidder, why give them money, it makes no sense, those 11,000 jobs may go away anyway, then who pays the bill. You do!!!!!!!!!!
Report this comment

Post a comment




MORE BY JAIME ADAME
To Good Health
City aggressively seeks to cut workers' comp costs [May 15, 2013]
Acceptable Waste
Permanent site pushed for hazardous chemicals [May 15, 2013]
Beauty Call
Cleanup goals for city involve collaboration [May 8, 2013]

My Profile | My Settings

Subscriptions Available at $124/yr.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for processing. No refunds are issued. Back issues are available for $10/copy.

We accept Visa, M/C, checks and money orders. Call to charge by phone 918-592-5550. Enter your contact information in the form below and we will contact you.

If ordering by mail, make checks and money orders payable to Urban Tulsa Weekly. Send your payment along with your complete postal delivery address to Urban Tulsa Weekly, Attn: Samantha, PO Box 50499, Tulsa, OK 74150

Name:
Address:
Address2:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:
Phone:
Comments:

 

Urban Tulsa Weekly
1924 E. 6th St.
Tulsa OK 74104
Phone: (918) 592-5550
Fax: (918) 592-5970
e-mail: Subscriptions

Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2013, Urban Tulsa Weekly   RSS