ABoT Vote Nowurbatulsaclassifiedsbutton
  TULSA METRO'S ONLY INDEPENDENT NEWSWEEKLY
UTW Reader Comments  |  Has Something Made You Mad? Tell Us!    
Home » News » City, State, County, Education
  RSS XML


The Pearl Unfurled

Options laid out before code vote


BY JAIME ADAME

The public feedback is in.

But discussion about backbone featured prominently at a Feb. 20 work session of the Tulsa Metro Area Planning Commission.

The meeting included the first discussion of possibly expanding new property development guidelines since three meetings soliciting public opinion on what's known as the city's form-based code.



COURTESTY OF INCOG

On the table is a proposal to apply the code to a larger section of the Pearl District neighborhood east of downtown, with commissioners agreeing in the work session to vote on several options at their March 6 meeting.

The lengthy process continues to bring out strong opinions, however.

"I believe that our planning commission has continued to pass the buck and pass the ball to staff, and staff was treated like dirt by many people at those meetings," said Brandon Perkins, one of nine volunteer planning commissioners wrangling with the proposal since April. (The 11-member board also includes designees of the Tulsa mayor and the Tulsa County commissioners.)

Perkins added: "What we're charged to do is make tough decisions, which may not be popular with individuals, for the greater good of Tulsa, Oklahoma."

At the earlier public workshop meetings, city staff took notes as citizens talked about changes they would like to see in the code.

Though the code would not require any changes to existing property, its requirements would kick in for new construction or extensive renovation projects.

Proving unpopular were code features like building height requirements (in some designated areas, new construction would need to be two-stories) and a prohibition against using lots solely for parking.

Most 2012 meetings on the proposal focused on the size of the area to possibly expand the guidelines. Initially, the proposal covered the roughly 70 blocks of the neighborhood. Now, however, a pared down plan would apply mainly to portions of E. 6th Street and S. Peoria Avenue.

At the March 6 meeting, commissioners are expected to vote on whether they want to keep the form-based code and its regulations unchanged or move to make changes to the code.

Bill Leighty, the planning commissioner who has been very vocal in favor of the form-based code, spoke again about its importance.

"This is really a philosophical struggle in my view between people who have a death grip on the past and people who want to see progressive changes in our community," Leighty said, noting that he was advised when he first accepted the post not to be intimidated "by a room full of people who want to have their way."

He continued: "Our job is not to be swayed by public opinion as much as it is about doing what is right for our community."

(Leighty is also a UTW contributor.)

Dwayne Midget, the mayor's designee on the commission, spoke about making sure all parties are heard.

"When we started down this road, if during that time people who were going to be impacted was not involved, I think it's incumbent upon on us to pump our brakes, slow down a bit and make sure those who are going to be impacted have an opportunity to participate and have a say so we can hear both sides of the issue," Midget said.

In the meeting, Perkins noted that many of the people involved in the early stages of drafting the form-based code did not attend the three public workshops.

Carolyn Back, a senior planner with the Indian Nations Council of Governments, agreed.



"I do believe, in communicating with that group, that after the last paring down of the regulating plan, that a lot of them have been frustrated," Back said.

But Perkins said he believed there was a flaw in the initial process in developing plans for the area.

"The group that originally put together the Pearl District 6th Street plan, I believe it was done without the input from a lot of very important players in this area," Perkins said.

Whatever decision made by the planning commission will be presented as a recommendation to the Tulsa City Council, so there may be other opportunities for the neighborhood group to make their case in favor of change.

Commissioners also said they would consider a request to amend what's known as the 6th Street Infill Plan, which was adopted in 2006. The amendment request was filed by the Pearl District Property Owners and Business Association, which was formed last year by critics of the form-based code guidelines.

Send all comments and feedback regarding City to jadame@urbantulsa.com



Share this article:
 
Google Bookmarks  digg  Del.icio.us  reddit  Yahoo My Web  Newsvine  MySpace 

COMMENTS
2 comments posted for this article
Citizen Planner
 3/ 1/2013 - 12:20pm
   Pay attention Tulsa, your area could be next.
   
   The 6th Street Infill Plan took ten years to develop and is part of our comprehensive plan. In those ten years, the 6th Street Infill Plan was advertised time and time again. Planning for the Form Base Code began in the year 2002 and the planning was done in two stages over a ten year period. Both stages of the FBC plan were the topic of many articles and interviews by our local media as well as public meetings hosted by the COT to educate the public about the code. After which, The Pearl District made history by becoming the first community in Oklahoma's to adopt a form base code.
   
   For anyone to say that they weren't included in either study or that they didn't know it was going on is laughable.
   
   The real story here is that we are witnessing a circus side show performance presented by lawyers who work for big corporations, with the specific purpose of insuring that this area remains blighted. They absolutely do not want The Pearl District to flourish. They want the value of this near downtown neighborhood to continue in decline so they can come along and buy this property cheap. Property that they will use for their own self interest and without restriction. They have no intention of engaging in thoughtful collaboration in neighborhood plans and they don't like the fact that the majority of stake holders in The Pearl District have better ideas. Ideas that provide the kind of city life that many people want. Ideas that make fiscal sense by providing the city with a large return on investment capital. The 6th Street Infill Plan is working! Take the time to look what has happened to Centennial Park and 6th Street in the past ten years! It's working!
   
   But NO, the corporate oligarchs are outraged! They complain to the Mayor and media that they didn't know! They weren't included! They have to change the plans now!!! Why? To benefit themselves of course.
   
   If we are ever going to see plans that will help us overcome the fiscal and demographic challenges of our time, then this kind of last minute political maneuvering must not be permitted to influence public policy. Corporations should be partners in neighborhood planning, not destroyers.
   
   Unfortunately, many of our city leaders will happily place the well being of the city and it's citizens well below the whims of their corporate masters. As long as "good ole boy politics and influence" are allowed to continue shaping policy in Tulsa, then there is no reason to engage the public in a charade of planning. Small Area Plans and PlaniTulsa are a waist of time and a lie.
   
   The truth is that the Form Based Code can provide us with the blueprint for making dense, walkable, vibrant neighborhoods a reality. It can provide us with the tools we need to reverse blight and to renew our older neighborhoods. Especially the neighborhoods that surround our downtown.
   
   Maybe that's why over 300 municipalities in the US have adopted a form based code.
   
   If you don't understand it, don't believe what you read. Find out the truth! Call Susan Miller at I.N.C.O.G. or Theron Warlick with the Tulsa Planning Department.
   
   They can tell you the pros and cons of the code and are happy to help.
Report this comment
Alleybrat, Pearl District
 2/28/2013 - 10:49pm
   Perkins is wrong in concluding that 'a lot of very important players' were left out early in the process. They decided not to participate, and not to speak up until the end of the process - and only then in order to bring things to a grinding halt. There were very regular and very public meetings throughout the process, which lasted years. This is a disgraceful example of a small minority of the old guard attempting to preserve a long-discredited status quo - and getting away with it. The TMAPC takes a good portion of the blame for letting this happen, particularly the Mayor's own delegate, who should know better. It must adopt this shriveled and weakened form-based code, and then it must start work immediately on expanding it further. Then perhaps Tulsa will finally stand a chance of joining the 21st. century alongside cities like Fayetteville, Fort Smith and Oklahoma City.
Report this comment

Post a comment




MORE BY JAIME ADAME
To Good Health
City aggressively seeks to cut workers' comp costs [May 15, 2013]
Acceptable Waste
Permanent site pushed for hazardous chemicals [May 15, 2013]
Beauty Call
Cleanup goals for city involve collaboration [May 8, 2013]

My Profile | My Settings

Subscriptions Available at $124/yr.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for processing. No refunds are issued. Back issues are available for $10/copy.

We accept Visa, M/C, checks and money orders. Call to charge by phone 918-592-5550. Enter your contact information in the form below and we will contact you.

If ordering by mail, make checks and money orders payable to Urban Tulsa Weekly. Send your payment along with your complete postal delivery address to Urban Tulsa Weekly, Attn: Samantha, PO Box 50499, Tulsa, OK 74150

Name:
Address:
Address2:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:
Phone:
Comments:

 

Urban Tulsa Weekly
1924 E. 6th St.
Tulsa OK 74104
Phone: (918) 592-5550
Fax: (918) 592-5970
e-mail: Subscriptions

Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2013, Urban Tulsa Weekly   RSS