POSTED ON DECEMBER 26, 2012:
We Don't Have the Right to Care
Drone strikes equivalent to dozens of Newtown massacres
We don't have the right to be sad.
We don't have the right to be angry.
We don't have the right to care about the 20 dead kids, much less the six dead adults or the one deranged shooter.
Our newspapers don't have the right to pretend that we are a nation stricken by grief. Our television networks don't have the right to put the Newtown shootings at the top of the news.
We don't have the right to gather around the water cooler and talk about how terrible it all is.
Our president doesn't have the right to express grief or remorse or pretend to be a human being or reference the fact that he is a parent or wipe his eye (assuming he was crying).
Our pundits don't have the right to use this massacre as a reason to call for gun control. Our Congress doesn't have the right to use it as a reason to propose a single piece of legislation.
Until we start caring about other people's dead kids and adults -- kids and adults made dead by American weapons -- we don't have the right to mourn our own.
Every couple of days, our president orders drone attacks against innocent people in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, and, no doubt, other places we are unaware of. But we don't care.
There is no moral or legal justification for a single one of the more than 3,100 murders committed by the U.S. via drones. The guilt or innocence of the drones' targets is never reviewed by any legal body (the White House won't even say how they compile their "kill lists"), the dead never have a chance to confront their accusers, and in any case the offed "militants" are not threats to the American people. They are merely political opponents of repressive regimes allied with the United States.
Moreover, the vast majority of the victims are innocent bystanders (by one count 36 civilians per militant), members of the families of the target, or people who simply happen to be at the wrong place at the wrong time.
PAUL DRABOT / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM
The Newtown massacre, so tragic and pointless, would be just another run-of-the-mill afternoon in the places targeted by America's campaign of aerial terror. On March 18, 2011, for example, a U.S. drone blew up between 17 and 40 civilians and policemen in the village of Datta Khel in the North Waziristan region of northwest Pakistan. This was part of America's nasty "double-tap" strategy.
"As the drone circled it let off the first of its Hellfire missiles, slamming into a small house and reducing it to rubble. When residents rushed to the scene of the attack to see if they could help, they were struck again," reported the UK Independent.
Not an accident. Double-taps are policy.
And we're okay with them.
Drone strikes approved by Presidents Bush and Obama have killed at least 168 children in Pakistan alone.
And in recent months, more than 100 people have been killed by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the same area.
And we don't care.
Actually, that's not fair. The truth is that we're pro-mass murder. Barack Obama makes Adam Lanza look like a peacenik, but we love him. A whopping 62 percent of Americans approve of Obama's extrajudicial drone war.
Let's give you, dear reader, the benefit of the doubt: let's assume you're one of the 38 percent of Americans who disapproves of one man acting as judge, jury, and executioner of people half a world away, seen through a video feed taken thousands of feet up. The fact remains, you probably don't lose a hell of a lot of sleep over the drone victims. Which is understandable. You don't know them. They wear funny clothes. They do live, after all, half a world away.
Which is why reporters don't cover their funerals. Why the Today Show doesn't interview their grieving relatives. Why our politicians don't shed tears (real or imagined) for them. Which is why we don't ask each other: "Why?"
Even the Left doesn't care. Not much. America's most recent major progressive movement, Occupy Wall Street, focused on economic injustice and corporate corruption. OWS hardly had a word to say about the drone strikes that killed so many children. America's "liberal" media -- NPR, The Nation, Mother Jones, and so forth -- barely mention them.
Which is fine. We have the right not to care about anything we want. Including dead kids. Even dead kids killed by our missiles. Even dead kids killed by a president we just reelected with a comfortable majority.
But since we have made a collective national decision to be a bunch of coldhearted bastards, we have to be morally consistent. And that means not caring about our kids either. Even when they are little, cute, white, and live in Fairfield County, an upscale suburb of New York City where many reporters, editors, and other members of the national media reside.
We owe it to the little, cute, brown kids we're killing in Pakistan. Stop caring about all kids.
"They had their entire lives ahead of them -- birthdays, graduations, weddings, kids of their own," Obama said of the Connecticut victims. That was equally true of the children Obama murdered -- some whose snuff videos he watched. It is also true of the children Obama is planning to murder. "We've endured too many of these tragedies in the past few years," the president continued.
Not that he cares.
URL for this story: http://www.urbantulsa.comhttp://www.urbantulsa.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A55512