Member since: October 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but the Alinsky tactic of pointing a finger and yelling "hypocrite" just won't work anymore. Then again, I guess the one way we could pay for these entitlement programs would be to only let those that support these programs be beneficiaries of them while putting the fiscal burden on all taxpayers. But, If I follow the writer's line of logic, then maybe we should place this fiscal burden on only the taxpayers that supported these invasive policies. BTW, I just loved the comparison between Obamacare and auto liabiltiy and how there is "no difference." Just off the top of my head I'll be happy to give a few differences. 1. Auto liability is mandatory under STATE law, not Federal law... that is why Auto liability doesn't violate The Constitution and Obamacare does..... but I wouldn't expect a progressive to know the difference between state govts and federal govts. 2. Auto liability isn't really mandatory since no one is forced to drive. 3. Pre existing conditions are not covered with any auto insurance. For instance, if I wreck my car and hurt someone, I can't run out and get a policy the next day to have the car fixed and cover the person I hurt. Nice try but your logic is completely flawed
|
|
|
Report this comment |
|

|